Posted On: August 27, 2008

Right to Counsel in a Texas DWI: by Plano DWI attorney Troy Burleson

by Collin, Dallas and Denton county DWI lawyer Troy Burleson

"I asked to speak to an attorney and the officer said I could not. Were my constitutional rights violated?"

This is a common question that clients ask me during the initial DWI interview. The answer is that your rights were probably not violated. DWI is unlike other criminal charges in that the right to counsel, under the 6th Amendment of the United States Constitution, does NOT automatically attach to an individual accused of drunk driving UNTIL formal charges are brought against that person.

The following 4 Texas State cases explain in further detail that a person being investigated for DWI does not automatically have a right to counsel

McCambridge v. State, 778 S.W.2d 70 (Tex.Crim.App. 1989)
Garcia v. State, 787 S.W.2d 957 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)
Jones v. State, 795 S.W.2d 171 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)
McRae v. State, 152 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004)

The landmark United States Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) prohibits an officer from interrogating a citizen for the purpose of gathering "testimonial or communicative" evidence without first reading the citizen his rights and giving the citizen an opportunity to speak with counsel.

The problem with DWI cases is that the Supreme Court has ruled that none of the typical evidence gathered during a DWI investigation (odors, results of sobriety tests, book in questions, breath test refusal or breath test results, etc.) are considered protected under the Constitution. Therefore, since this evidence in "nontestimonial" in nature according to the Supreme Court, then a citizen DOES NOT have a right to speak with an attorney until AFTER the police officer decided to charge you with Driving while intoxicated.

Most officers will testify that they did not decide to charge you with DWI until after you gave, or refused to give, a breath sample. This covers the officer from having to read you your rights or allowing you to speak to an attorney until that time. However, officers sometimes say things during a DWI investigation that DOES trigger your right to counsel. This is why, it is very important to have your attorney watch the videotape of your arrest thouroughly. If your Miranda rights are triggered, then often times a good attorney can keep certain evidence from being admitted in trial, including not limited to, a breath or blood sample, incriminating statements about drinking, videos, etc.

Posted On: August 26, 2008

SHOW THEM THE MONEY!!!: How having one drink and driving can help police hit the government grant JACKPOT. by Collin County DWI lawyer Troy Burleson

by Collin, Dallas and Denton county DWI lawyer Troy Burleson

If you believe that the local district attorneys win all of the DWI cases they take to trial, you are misinformed. The reality is that they only win about HALF of the DWI cases that actually make it to trial. Many client, and jurors, have asked my why that is the case. Well, it's all about the money. Yes, the big sweet dollar! DWI is a big business. Anyone who tells you differently has his or her head in the sand.

You may be asking, "How are local police agencies making money from DWI arrests?" Well, it is simple. The State of Texas gives police departments grant money to have local squads of officers do nothing but arrest people for DWI. Don’t' believe me? Well read this article about a small town police chief "hit[ting] the jackpot" by carrying out a grant based ticket campaign recently.

To defense lawyers, hearing the news of police agencies getting money for arresting people is old hat. However, most citizens have a less jaded view of the "noble" officers who patrol their streets. Trust me, cross-examine enough officers and you will learn that the good, the bad, and the ugly exist in every police force.

So, "how does grant money effect people charged with DWI?" Simple, because the pressure is so intense to cover the arrest quota to keep the grant money flowing there are many bad arrests for DWI. It doesn't matter to the police if you are ultimately convicted, they just need the arrests. Remember, going one mile per hour over the speed limit and having bloodshot eyes, or admitting to having one drink is enough for an officer to arres you for DWI in the State of Texas. That is the hard truth.

Posted On: August 1, 2008

On the Atkins Diet? Don't take a Breath Test: by Plano DWI attorney Troy Burleson

by Collin County DWI lawyer Troy Burleson

If you are on a low carb diet such as the Atkins Diet you should NOT consent to a breath test if you are stopped and suspected of driving while intoxicated. As I have reported here before in detail, low carb diets like Atkins may raise a persons acetone levels. The breath machine used by the State of Texas, the Intoxilyzer 5000, measures Ethyl Alcohol molecular compounds to determine a person breath alcohol concentration (BAC). However, many other chemical substances such as acetone have similar molecular structure to ethyl alcohol.

Below is a good article form Arizona DUI attorney Daniel Jaffe about weight loss diets and breath testing.